النواسخ الحرفية بين ابن عقيل والأشموني في شرح الألفية (دراسة وصفيًة تحليليًة لمكونات الجملة في اللغة العربيًة)

Abstract

Using analytical method, the researcher targets at determining the differences in views between IBN-Aquil and AL-Ashmoony in the subject of AL-nwasikh ALharfia in their interpretation of ALfiat Ibn Malik. No one of thet two interpreters stood in fanaticism to support any one of the two rival grammar schools but Ashmoony appears to be more inclined to the "Basrian school", where he agreed with them on two different matters that the Kofe's school would not agree with . As for IBN- Aquil, he joined the Basrians on only one debated questions .and he kept away from dealing with all other points that were in dispute between the Basrians and Kofes. Both interpreters counterpoise between the congregation and the grammarians who were opposing their views. IBN-Aquil was in an agreement with the congregation, on one of questionable matters . For the rest of the debatable questions he is seen to have kept himself away without speaking his mind. On the other hand, AL-Ashmoony agreed with the congregation on one of the points argued and , while refraining from giving any thoughts about one. Both scholars opposed IBN-Malik in his dealing with so many grammatical issues. This strict opposition to IBN-Malik shows how independent and unique those men were. They had a lot to take against him. The most significant of which was his self contradiction on one of the grammatical issues in his ALFIA and some other written works of his, in general, AL-Ashmoony picked out more drawbacks in IBN-Malik's works than what IBN Oquail did The two scholars recorded many corrective remarks and elaborations on IBN-Malik's work, and there we can detect that AL-Ashmoony was much more particular about verifying and detailing other grammarian's ideas. so, many minute details can be traced in explanations that are associated with the different topics.